McKissick v. S. O. A., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
MIKELL, Judge.
Timothy McKissick filed suit alleging malicious prosecution and malicious arrest against S. O. A, Inc. (“SOA”), and its president, Steven Aydelott. The trial court granted summary judgment to SOA and Aydelott on McKissick’s claims. McKissick appeals, arguing that there was no probable cause to support his prosecution for theft by deception. Because we find that genuine issues of fact remain as to the issues of probable cause and malice, we reverse the grant of summary judgment.
On appeal from the grant of a motion for summary judgment, we conduct a de novo review of the law and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Melton v. LaCalamitoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Monroe v. SiglerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Willis v. BrassellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Adams v. CarlisleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Heller v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. Smith (In re Smith)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2013
- McKissick v. AYDELOTTCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Reid v. Waste Indus. USA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Thompson v. ReichertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- DIXON v. KRAUSE Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.