Legal Opinion

Vojnovic v. Brants

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 25, 2005No. A04A1909PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Chief Judge.

Sheila Brants sued Gregory Vojnovic and Statler Restaurants Partners, LLC (collectively, “the defendants”) for malicious prosecution and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The trial court denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on these claims, and the case proceeded to a jury trial. The jury awarded Brants $21,750, and the defendants appeal. According to the defendants, the trial court erred in failing to direct a verdict on Brants’ malicious prosecution claim. For reasons that follow, we disagree and affirm.

“Where a jury returns a verdict and it has…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Period Homes, Ltd. v. WallickSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  2. IBF Participating Income Fund v. Dillard-Winecoff, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  3. American Multi-Cinema, Inc. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. Condon v. VickeryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. Wolf Camera, Inc. v. RoyterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Adams v. CarlisleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Turnage v. KasperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Argentum International, LLC v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Building Materials Wholesale, Inc. v. Triad Drywall, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  5. McNeely v. Home Depot, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API