Legal Opinion

Smith v. King County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1914No. 11533PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Smith, J., entered April 19, 1913, upon findings in favor of the defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

On April 16, 1890, Lillie R. Parker and William E. Parker, being the owners of a tract of “logged-off” land, in King county, then and now without the limits of any incorporated city or town, platted the same as Bryn Mawr. The plat contains sixty-two blocks. The property involved in this controversy lies within the heavy lines shown upon the annexed plat, and embraces all of Lake avenue between the north line of Emerson avenue and the south line of Bryant avenue, and that part of Carlysle avenue lying east of the railway line.

*275On August 29, 1905, the Bryn Mawr Land Company, being then the owner…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City of Corsicana v. ZornTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Murphy v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Boise City v. HonIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Field v. Village of ManchesterMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Hagen v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Van Buren v. TrumbullWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Lewis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Tamblin v. CrowleyWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Burkhard v. BowenWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Engstrom v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API