Legal Opinion

Hagen v. Mills

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1913No. 11254PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered October 19, 1912, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to quiet title.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

— The parties to this action are contending over the ownership of a vacated street lying between lot 3, in block 162 and block 165, in Gilman Park addition to the city of Seattle. That our statement of the facts may be the better understood, we have caused a plat to be reproduced for present reference.

Blocks 162 and 165 were acquired by the Seattle Iron & Steel Manufacturing Company, a corporation, on the 27th day of August, 1889.

On the 7th day of October, 1889, the county commissioners of King county granted the petition of the Seattle Iron & Steel Manufacturing Company, and by an order then…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Samuel D. Harris and Others v. Jesse D. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
  2. Milburn v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
  3. Kimball v. City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Rowe v. JamesWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. White v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Roeder Co. v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Bradley v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Harbican v. ChamberlinWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Smith v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Town of Moorcroft v. LangWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API