Legal Opinion

Burkhard v. Bowen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1949No. 30599PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, C. J.

This action was instituted by W. J. Burk-hard, as the owner of lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10,11, and 12, block 29, Phoenix Park addition to Olympia, against Fred S. Bowen and Bella Bowen, his wife, Holger E. Jensen and Nola Jensen, his wife, and the city of Olympia, to quiet title to a part of a fifteen foot alley running easterly and westerly through block 29. Defendants Fred S. Bowen and wife were the only defendants who filed a formal appearance in the case, so far as the record before us shows. These defendants appeared by amended answer and cross-complaint, in which they admitted all the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Centralia Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Murphy v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Van Buren v. TrumbullWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Howell v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Tamblin v. CrowleyWashington Supreme Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gillis v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. CAPITOL HILL METH. CH. OF SEATTLE v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. State v. WinebergWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Smith v. JC Penney CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  5. Beebe v. SwerdaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API