Donahue v. Meister
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Nevada County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is, in form, an action under section 738 of the Code of Civil Procedure to quiet title to a certain quartz-mining claim and land called by plaintiff the “ Uncle Sam ” claim. The complaint is in the usual form, and contains an averment that plaintiff is in possession of the premises in contest. In the answer, all the averments of the complaint are denied, except that of possession. It is further averred in the answer that the south half of said Uncle Sam claimed by plaintiff is identical with the north half of a quartz-mining claim called the “Waldeck,” belonging to defendant; that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Curtis v. SutterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Tabor v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
- Gleeson v. Martin White Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1878
- Hyde v. ReddingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Holland v. Mount Auburn Gold Quartz Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by56 opinions
- People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Davis v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Montana Ore Purchasing Co. v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1902
- Angus v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.