Legal Opinion

United States v. Garner

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 29, 1987No. Nos. 86-1707, 86-1711, 86-1734 thru 86-1738, 86-1777PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.

Eight defendants appeal their convictions for violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) (RICO), and the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951.1 The defendants were all House Drain Inspectors for the Department of Sewers of the City of Chicago. They raise on appeal nearly a score of issues. Their primary contentions are that they were improperly joined for trial, that the jury instructions were faulty, that inadmissible evidence was used against them, and that the evidence was insufficient to support their convictions. For the reasons…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Schaffer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. Milan Bagaric, Mile Markich, Ante Ljubas, Vinko Logarusic, Ranko Primorac, and Drago SudarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Rose v. BartleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  2. Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando EstevezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Daniel L. BalzanoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API