Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. Amador Water Agency

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided June 14, 2019No. C082079Published

1Concurrence

Murray, J., Concurring.

While I concur in the majority's opinion, I write separately to note two differences between this case and *191Wilde v. City of Dunsmuir (2018) 29 Cal.App.5th 158 ( Wilde ).

First, in Wilde , the city's resolution changing water service rates included a major upgrade of the city's water delivery infrastructure. As we noted, "The new water rates are the product of a newly formulated set of policies that implemented a new set of choices: to replace a 105-year-old water storage tank as well as selected old water mains. [The plan] also represents policy choices about how to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilde v. City of Dunsmuir, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API