Legal Opinion

Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. Amador Water Agency

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided June 14, 2019No. C082079Published

1Opinion of the Court

HULL, J.-

Citizens submitted a referendum petition to challenge Amador Water Agency's board resolution No. 2015-19 (Resolution), adopting new water service rates for Agency customers. (Cal. Const., art. II, §§ 9 [voters have referendum power to approve or reject state statutes except, e.g., tax levies], 11 [referendum power may be exercised by city and county electors under procedures provided by Legislature]; Stats. 1975, ch. 63, § 1, p. 112, West's Ann. Wat.-Appen. (1999 ed.) §§ 95-3.8, p. 118 [water agency has power to fix and collect rates and charges for its services]; Stats. 1959, ch.

*284…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Sangster v. PaetkauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Simpson v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Rossi v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Geiger v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API