Legal Opinion

Troiano v. Zoning Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 26, 1967PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.

The zoning commission of the town of North Branford held a duly warned public hearing on July 8, 1965, for the purpose of considering the adoption of certain amendments to article XIII of the zoning regulations concerning sand and gravel pits. The plaintiff, an owner and operator of a sand and gravel pit, appeared at the hearing through his attorney and opposed the proposed amendments on the ground that their enactment would prevent him from continuing to engage in the sand and gravel business. On September 3, 1965, the zoning commission voted to adopt the amendments. From this action by the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Pierce v. AlbaneseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  4. Jennings v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  5. Murphy, Inc. v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Collins v. YorkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  2. Stiles v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  3. Aunt Hack Ridge Estates, Inc. v. Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  4. Wilson v. Connecticut Product Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  5. R & R Pool & Home, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API