Legal Opinion
R & R Pool & Home, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 19, 1996No. 15050PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
This appeal arises out of the denial of an application for site plan approval made to the zoning authorities of the town of Ridgefield. The plaintiffs, R and R Pool and Home, Inc. (R & R), and Neil Farans, Alvin G. Farans and Diane Green, as individuals and as principals of the involved partnerships (partnership),1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their appeal from the decision of the defendant, the zoning board of appeals of the town of Ridgefield (board). The board’s decision affirmed the denial of a site plan application by the defendant Oswald Inglese, planning…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Primerica v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Beckish v. ManafortSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Tedesco v. City of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- DiBonaventura v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- R & R Pool & Patio, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Bethlehem Christian Fellowship, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Lauver v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Nizzardo v. State Traffic CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Goodridge v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.