Legal Opinion

Jacobson v. Pope & Talbot

California Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1932No. Docket No. S.F. 13517PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The plaintiff appeals from that portion of a decree which quiets his title to a described parcel of real property “subject” to certain attachment liens in favor of the defendants.

Marion Barker and Ruth Barker, husband and wife, originally owned the property here involved in joint tenancy. What purports to be a declaration of homestead covering the same was recorded by them on January 5, 1928. In various actions instituted by the defendants herein against Marion Barker certain writs of attachment were thereafter issued and levied upon his interest in the property. On May 11, 1928, he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fitzell v. LeakyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Beaton v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Fairchild v. HedgesWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. McCracken v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Yager v. YagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Reddy v. GonzalezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. In Re DudleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1947
  4. Johnson v. BraunerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Walton v. WaltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API