Legal Opinion
Reddy v. Gonzalez
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 17, 1992No. H008719PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CAPACCIOLI, Acting P. J.
A transfer from Gilbert Gonzalez to his then-wife, defendant Mellina Gonzalez, of Gilbert’s interest in the family home was set aside as a fraudulent conveyance. On appeal, defendant claims that the conveyance could not have been fraudulent since the property was subject to a homestead exemption. In addition, she asserts that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding of actual fraud. For the reasons expressed below, we affirm.
Facts
In 1985 Gilbert was involved in an unsuccessful real estate transaction with plaintiff Sesha Reddy. Plaintiff subsequently…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Overton v. Vita-Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Fross v. WottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Hansford v. LassarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- San Diego White Truck Co. v. SwiftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Freeman v. LaMorteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Mejia v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Reichardt v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Meister v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Cortez v. VogtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Lyons v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.