Legal Opinion

Stone v. International Marine Carriers, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1996No. S-6261, S-6262PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal requires us to determine whether the Suits in Admiralty Act (SAA), 46 U.S.C. §§ 741-52, or the Public Vessels Act (PVA), 46 U.S.C. §§ 781-90, precludes an injured seaman’s claims against a private contractor for willful failure to pay maintenance and cure. This appeal also involves the superior court’s rulings on several motions relating to discovery and discovery sanctions.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Thomas Stone was hired by International Marine Carriers, Inc. (IMC) to work as an able-bodied seaman aboard the U.S.N.S. SEALIFT ANTARCTIC.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Miles v. Apex Marine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Adkins v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Guevara v. Maritime Overseas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Reid v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Christensen v. NCH Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Lockwood v. Geico General Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Coulson v. Marsh & McLennan, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Peter v. Progressive Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API