Legal Opinion

Peter v. Progressive Corp.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1999No. S-8608PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

After receiving a total of twelve interrogatories from the plaintiffs in a lawsuit alleging bad faith in the delay of underinsured motorist payments, the defendant insurer asked the superior court to appoint a discovery master to handle all future discovery disputes. The court granted the request and ordered that the master’s fees be paid by the losing party in each discovery dispute. The plaintiffs appeal, claiming that use of discovery masters is unfair to financially disadvantaged parties. We vacate the superior court’s order and remand for determination…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Bush v. ReidAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Sykes v. Melba Creek Mining, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Brandon v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Prentzel v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Progressive Corp. v. Peter Ex Rel. PeterAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Willoya v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API