Legal Opinion

Adkins v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1980No. 4410PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., and CON-NOR, BOOCHEVER, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ. BOOCHEVER, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order granting a summary judgment dismissing Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc., from a personal injury action brought by Prather M. Adkins. The essential question is whether Adkins could, under Alaska’s tolling statute, AS 09.10.140, add Nabors as a party defendant after the limitations period. Adkins claimed that he was “insane” within the meaning of the tolling statute. Adkins also contended that under Alaska Rule of Civil Procedure 15(c), the amendment to his complaint…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Nicola Panichella v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, (Warner Brothers Pictures, Inc., a Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  2. Concerned Citizens of South Kenai Peninsula v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Craig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. Jennings v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Abelino ARCHULETA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DUFFY’S INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Cikan v. ARCO Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Richardson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. French v. Jadon, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Shooshanian v. WagnerAlaska Supreme Court · 1983

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API