United States v. Wayne Harrison
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEHER, District Judge:
This interlocutory appeal requires us to examine the doctrinal boundaries of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel.. A defendant’s right to counsel attaches when the government initiates adversary proceedings by indictment, arraignment, or other means. A criminal defendant is entitled to the assistance of counsel upon invoking the Sixth Amendment right following its attachment. We hold that, in limited and well-defined circumstances, a defendant’s ongoing representation by an attorney, although that representation began before indictment, invokes the right to counsel…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Donald Edward Beaty v. Terry Stewart, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Maxwell Hoffman v. A.J. Arave, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Shawn Tyrone PercyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. SteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- State v. BoorigieSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.