Legal Opinion

United States v. Wayne Harrison

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 29, 2000No. 99-10496PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEHER, District Judge:

This interlocutory appeal requires us to examine the doctrinal boundaries of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel.. A defendant’s right to counsel attaches when the government initiates adversary proceedings by indictment, arraignment, or other means. A criminal defendant is entitled to the assistance of counsel upon invoking the Sixth Amendment right following its attachment. We hold that, in limited and well-defined circumstances, a defendant’s ongoing representation by an attorney, although that representation began before indictment, invokes the right to counsel…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Donald Edward Beaty v. Terry Stewart, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Maxwell Hoffman v. A.J. Arave, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Shawn Tyrone PercyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. SteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  5. State v. BoorigieSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API