Legal Opinion

United States v. Shawn Tyrone Percy

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 11, 2001No. 99-10488PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal, we are called upon to determine whether a federal agent’s interrogation of Shawn Percy violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel because the interrogation occurred in the absence of counsel, but after Percy’s tribal arraignment on charges stemming from the same incident. We hold that the interrogation was proper because, even if Percy’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel attached at his tribal arraignment, Percy executed a valid waiver of that right before submitting to questioning by federal agents. We also conclude that Percy’s other claims of trial…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Maine v. MoultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. SutcliffeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. Rosa HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. State of Arizona v. Dennis JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Nzelo Chinedu OkaforCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API