Legal Opinion

Maxwell Hoffman v. A.J. Arave, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 3, 2001No. 99-99002PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

Maxwell Hoffman (“Hoffman”) appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, in which he claims, inter alia, that the district court erred in finding that: (1) Idaho Code § 19-2719 was an adequate and independent state law ground to support the state court’s judgment that petitioner had defaulted his ineffective assistance of counsel claims; (2) petitioner’s due process rights were not violated by the state trial court’s refusal to allow petitioner’s attorney to be present at the presentence interview conducted by the state probation…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Clarence Ray Allen v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, of the California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Leavitt v. AraveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Butler v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Andre Marcus Bragg v. Warden GalazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API