Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Wolferman v. Superior Court

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1893No. 1098PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Original Application for Prohibition.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Soott, J.

This is an application for a writ of prohibition to restrain said court from entertaining or proceeding with a petition to modify a judgment and decree theretofoi’e rendered in an action by Laura Wolferman, as administratrix, etc., against Harry C. Bell, Belle Bell et al.

Said action was brought in said court to foreclose a certain mortgage, and a decree was rendered in favor of plaintiff and against defendants therein, whereupon the defendants appealed said cause to this court and judgment was here rendered affirming the decree of the lower…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Sibbald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  2. Mulford v. EstudilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Wolferman v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Kirby v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Prentice v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State Ex Rel. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State ex rel. Wolferman v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Wolferman v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Richardson v. SearsWashington Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API