Wolferman v. Bell
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dunbar, C. J.
It would be profitless in this case to undertake to review the authorities, for they are numerous and irreconcilable; some courts holding that an alteration of the face of a writing raises no presumption either way, but that the question is one for the jury. Other courts have held that the alteration raises the presumption that it was made before delivery; others that in such cases the *85presumption attaches that the change was made after delivery, and that it must he explained before it is received in evidence. Still others, that it raises…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cited by16 opinions
- First National Bank v. FordWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
- Robertson v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Miller v. Perris Irrigation Dist.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1898
- State ex rel. Wolferman v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Merchants Bank & Trust Co. v. Peoples BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.