Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Sears
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 13, 1915No. 12201PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered April 17, 1914, in favor of the plaintiff, after an order of remand from the supreme court, in an action for equitable relief.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
In November, 1909, this action was instituted by the respondent, as plaintiff, against the appellants, as defendants, to compel the specific performance of a contract to convey real property. The respondent prevailed in the action; the court entering a decree therein, the *208material parts of which, necessary here to be noticed, being as follows:
“It is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, P. C. Richardson, is the owner in fee simple, and entitled immediately upon payment to the defendants of the sum of $11,634.43 with interest from September 24, 1911, at six per cent per…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Post v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- State ex rel. Wolferman v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- State ex rel. Jefferson County v. HatchWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Kath v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Pacific Drug Co. v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bolcom Mills, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Kosten v. FlemingWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Empson v. FortuneWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Gudmundson v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
- Gudmundson v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.