Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. District Court

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1926No. 6,063PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stark

It has long been the custom of courts in reviewing the decrees in equity cases where all of the facts were presented on an appeal, and showed that the cause was ripe for an ultimate decision, to make such disposition of the case as the court below ought to have made. As early as the year 1800 Chancellor Kent, in Le Guen v. Gouverneur, 1 Johns. Cas. (N. Y.), at page 508, 1 Am. Dec. 121, pointed out that this was a “leading maxim” of appellate jurisdiction in England; that since our system of jurisprudence was borrowed from that country, in the absence of express and peremptory statutory…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Skillern's Executors v. May's ExecutorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  3. United States v. Milliken Imprinting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Monson v. La France Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State ex rel. La France Copper Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1909

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Vonica v. Unknown Foreign & Non-Resident Heirs of Eli StoianMontana Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Bradbury v. NagelhusMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. In Re Stoian's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Woodward v. PerkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Bond v. BirkMontana Supreme Court · 1952

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API