Legal Opinion

Spoerle v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided December 31, 2007No. 3:07-cv-00300PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.

This case presents a straightforward question: does the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219, require defendant Kraft Foods Global, Inc., to pay its employees for time they spend putting on and taking off items of safety and sanitation equipment that defendant’s policies and federal law require the employees to wear?

Plaintiffs contend that they are entitled to compensation because donning and doffing the equipment constitutes “work” under the FLSA. Although defendant does not dispute plaintiffs’ basic characterization, it argues that…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Livadas v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Kellar v. Summit Seating Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  2. Collins v. Sanderson Farms, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2008
  3. Franklin v. Kellogg Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  4. Jordan v. IBP, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2008
  5. Musch v. Domtar Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API