Kellar v. Summit Seating Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
Susan Kellar contends that she is entitled to overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act for work performed prior to the official start of her work shift. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of her employer, Summit Seating, because it found that Kellar’s pre-shift activities were “preliminary,” that any work Kellar performed before her shift was “de minimis,” and that Summit did not know that Kellar was engaging in pre-shift work. While we disagree with the district court’s conclusions regarding the “preliminary” and “de minimis ” nature of Kellar’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Barbara Payne v. Michael PauleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- IBP, Inc. v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Steiner v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by149 opinions
- Anthony Hill v. Daniel M. TangherliniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Nancie Cloe v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Alex Reinig v. RBS Citizens NACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Troester v. Starbucks CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Bergman v. Kindred Healthcare, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.