Legal Opinion
Musch v. Domtar Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 25, 2009No. 08-4305PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant, Alan Musch, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated (collectively “Plaintiffs”), seeks compensation for the time spent changing clothes and showering at the end of each work shift. The district court judge found that these activities were non-compensable postliminary activities, and entered summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee, Domtar Industries. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs are hourly paid maintenance employees at Domtar’s paper mills, located in Nekoosa and Port Edwards, Wisconsin. Musch alleges that Plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- IBP, Inc. v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Anthony Piscione v. Ernst & Young, L.L.P.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Hicks v. Midwest Transit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Pirant v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Spoerle v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Carroll v. Stryker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Katherine Lees v. Carthage CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Wickens v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Schaefer-LaRose v. Eli Lilly & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Michael A. Willis v. William J. LepCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.