Legal Opinion

Barton v. Recorder's Court

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1911PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From Malheur: Dalton Biggs, Judge. This is a proceeding by writ of review to review a judgment of the City Recorder’s Court of Vale, Oregon, in which plaintiff, T. A. Barton, was found guilty of selling intoxicating liquors without first having obtained a license so to do. From a judgment of the circuit court denying the relief prayed for in his application for review, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Eakin.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the circuit court in a proceeding to review a judgment of the recorder’s court of the city of Vale, Oregon, wherein plaintiff was found guilty of selling intoxicating liquors within the city, without having obtained a license therefor.

It appears that prior to the general election of 1910 the sale of intoxicating liquors was prohibited within the city of Vale, and the result of that election was against prohibition ; that, the city being without an ordinance governing the subject of the sale of intoxicating liquors, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sears v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Fleischner v. ChadwickOregon Supreme Court · 1874
  3. State v. WileyOregon Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. Arizona MortuaryArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Campbell v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Sanborn v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  4. McCall v. State Ex Rel. DanielsSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  5. Hatfield v. MeersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API