Legal Opinion

Marin Municipal Water District v. Peninsula Paving Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 1939No. Civ. 10539PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Defendant, Peninsula Paving Company, appeals from a judgment against it and in favor of plaintiff, Marin Municipal Water District, rendered in an action brought by plaintiff for damages for injury to its pipe line alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence in constructing a state highway.

The basic facts are not materially in dispute. The plaintiff is a municipal water district engaged in the business of supplying water to various municipalities in Marin County. In the performance of this function it maintains various distributing water mains. One such main was a twelve-inch cast…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Reardon v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Perkins v. BlauthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. De Baker v. Southern California RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Eachus v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Green v. SwiftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Heimann v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Alisal Sanitary District v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Glade v. DietertTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Smith v. Lockheed Propulsion Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Moore v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API