Legal Opinion
County of Santa Barbara v. Connell
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 18, 1999No. D031171PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, J.
State Controller Kathleen Connell (the Controller) audited the court revenues of the County of Santa Barbara for the period of July 1, 1991, through June 30, 1994, to determine the adequacy of the court revenues it remitted to the state. She determined the County of Santa Barbara was entitled to withhold only $3, rather than the $25 it actually withheld as funding for automation and micrographics, from each civil filing fee collected from September 15, 1992 (the effective date of the Trial Court Trust *178Fund legislation) through June 1994. Her audit directed the County of Santa…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Stop Youth Addiction, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- California School Employees Ass'n v. Governing Board of South Orange County Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. CiancioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Mason v. RETIREMENT BD. CITY & COUNTY SFCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Sacks v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Wolski v. FREMONT INVESTMENT & LOANCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.