Legal Opinion
People v. Ciancio
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 27, 2003No. B161077PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MALLANO, J.
In this case of first impression, we address the issue of whether male alleged sexually violent predators (alleged SVP’s) under the Sexually Violent Predators Act (SVPA or Act) (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.), who were released from prison and are being detained pending trial in the Los Angeles County jail (county jail), are entitled to appropriate housing outside the county jail and psychiatric treatment under the SVPA. Such treatment is not currently provided at the county jail. The alleged SVP’s, who were at different stages of pretrial proceedings, filed motions…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Hubbart v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. OttoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Hamilton v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- DIAL 800 v. FesbinderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Serrano v. STEFAN MERLI PLASTERING CO.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Morel v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Donaldson v. National Marine, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.