Rousso v. Barber
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a decree of the District Court holding claims 1, 2, 3 and 5 of the Rousso patent No. 1,157,046 void for want of invention. At the trial infringement of the patent, if valid, was admitted, and the validity of the patent turned on the question of priority of invention — a pure question of fact.
The subject matter of the patent is a towel cabinet of the kind now generally found in lavatories of office buildings, hotels and restaurants. The need for such a device was brought about by the misuse of towels in public places and by loss from, petty…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Chapman v. WintroathSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Baldwin Co. v. R. S. Howard Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Gold v. GoldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1916
- Loughran v. Quaker City Chocolate & Confectionery Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Solomon v. RenstromCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Kuhlke Mach. Co. v. Miller Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1925
- Rousso v. First Nat. Bank in DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Rousso v. First Nat. Bank in DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1927
- Corley v. RobinsonDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.