Legal Opinion

American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Milgo Electronic Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 24, 1976No. 76 Civ. 996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITMAN KNAPP, District Judge.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment of patent invalidity and noninfringement and for a determination of priority of invention. Here involved is the defendant Milgo Electronic Corporation’s (“Milgo”) motion to dismiss, or alternatively, to stay plaintiffs’ second cause of action, which purports to state a claim of interference under 35 U.S.C. § 291. 1 The allegedly interfering patents in the § 291 cause of action are Howson patent 3,679,977 owned by plaintiff Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc. (“Bell Labs”) and Whang patent 3,760,277 owned by defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Research Corporation v. Radio Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1960
  2. Kuhlke Mach. Co. v. Miller Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1925
  3. Cover v. SchwartzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  4. United States v. Marifarms, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1972
  5. General Foods Corp. v. Struthers Scientific & International Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. National Business Systems, Inc. v. AM International, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  2. Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
  3. Amersham International PLC. v. Corning Glass WorksDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984
  4. Pfizer Inc. v. Apotex Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API