Legal Opinion
Craig Demagnetizer & Ink Dryer Corp. v. Static Control Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 3, 1923No. 18PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
On May 23, 1911, there was granted to the appellee Frank R. Craig letters patent No. 993,034 “for improvements in the means and methods of demagnetizing paper” on an application filed January 9, 1908. Craig transferred the patent to the appellant. In that agreement of transfer, he covenanted and agreed that any further instruments necessary would be executed by him and any further acts and things which would be necessary to carry into full effect the true intent and meaning of the agreement between the appellant and the appellee Frank R. Craig would be done so that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Henry v. A. B. Dick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Butterworth v. United States Ex Rel. HoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Geneva Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. S. Karpen & Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- New Marshall Engine Co. v. Marshall Engine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hanna v. Brictson Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Kuhlke Mach. Co. v. Miller Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1925
- Beidler v. Photostat CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1935
- Wailes Dove-Hermiston Corp. v. Oklahoma Contracting Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1931
- Miller v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.