Tarwater v. State

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

It now appears by satisfactory evidence that the statement of facts in this case was-filed in the trial court within the time pre scribed, and that the date of filing as it originally appeared thereon was, in fact, incorrect.

The conclusion is reached that the statement of facts is properly before us for consideration.

Accordingly, appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted and the judgment of affirmance is set aside, and the case will now be considered on its merits.

Denison, the person to whom it was alleged appellant attempted to pass the forged check, was an employee…