Legal Opinion

Pendleton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 30, 1968No. 41512PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ONION, Judge.

The offense is unlawfully passing as true a forged instrument; the punishment, enhanced under the provisions of Article 63, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., life.

At the outset appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction.

State’s witness, James Edwards, a service station operator in Dallas County, testified that on November 6, 1966, appellant purchased a battery, a battery cable and $2.00 worth of gasoline from him; that appellant paid for such merchandise with a payroll account check of the J. R. Miller Trucking Company, signed by a R. L. Richie and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Denham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Tarwater v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Randel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1949
  4. Tarwater v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Olson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Buchanan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Guzmon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Peach v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API