Legal Opinion

Albrecht v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 25, 1972No. 45117PublishedCited by 619 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for unlawfully passing as true a forged instrument. After the jury returned a verdict of guilty, punishment was assessed by the court at two years.

Appellant challenges the validity of this conviction on the ground that the trial court erroneously admitted into evidence three forged checks which were similar in nature to the instrument which appellant stood charged with having passed. He argues that: (1) under the circumstances of this case, proof of extraneous offenses was impermissible, and (2) the evidence was not sufficiently linked to…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Lanham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Pendleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by619 opinions

  1. Abdnor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Moses v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Casey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  5. Mayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

614 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API