Legal Opinion
United States v. Coleman
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided May 9, 2013No. 13-0007/ARPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY
delivered the opinion of the Court.
“[T]he suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution.” Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). We granted review to consider whether the military judge erred by failing to grant a defense motion for mistrial based on the trial counsel’s failure to disclose to the defense that the staff judge advocate (SJA) had agreed to recommend the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Cone v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Smith v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- United States v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. McFaddenCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. CommissoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
- United States v. ClaxtonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
- United States v. JorellUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
- United States v. Major MICHAEL F. STELLATOArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.