Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Modesto

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 29, 1995No. 94-1213; CMR No. 9002861PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

WISS, Judge:

1. Appellant was convicted by a general court-martial composed of officer members at Fort Carson, Colorado. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman (8 specifications), in violation of Article 133, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 933. He was sentenced to dismissal, as well as confinement and forfeiture of $3,000.00 pay per month for 9 months. The convening authority approved the sentence, and the Court of Military Review * affirmed. 39 MJ 1055 (1994).

2. This Court granted review on the following…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
  5. United States v. DeainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. HumpherysCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  2. United States v. WiesenCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
  3. United States v. Ralph F. VitaleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. RockwoodCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  5. United States v. AiCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API