Legal Opinion

Sindlinger v. Paul

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 1985No. Docket 78351PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from the May 3, 1984, order which granted defendants’ motion for accelerated judgment and dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint for foreclosure. We reverse.

Plaintiffs sold to defendants a parcel of real estate by land contract on February 15, 1979. The purchase price was $20,000 with no down pay- merit, and defendants were to make monthly payments of $150. The land contract contained the follwoing standard clauses:

"Right to Forfeit
"3(f) If the Purchaser shall fail to perform this contract or any part thereof, the Seller immediately after such default shall have the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dumas v. HelmMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Bishop v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Larson v. PittmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Minchella v. FredericksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Cooper v. Jefferson Investment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State-William Partnership v. GaleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Kent v. PipiaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Sindlinger v. PaulMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Kent v. PipiaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API