Legal Opinion

Kent v. Pipia

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 1, 1990No. Docket 116871PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holbrook, Jr., J.

This is a foreclosure action arising out of defendant’s breach of a May 20, 1986, land contract to purchase plaintiffs’ property located at 125 South Washington in Oxford, Michigan. Defendant appeals as of right an Oakland Circuit Court order dated March 29, 1989, granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary disposition, pursuant to MCR 2.116(0(10). On appeal, defendant claims foreclosure was improper since at the time plaintiffs’ complaint was filed defendant was not in default within the land contract’s acceleration period. We agree.

On May 20, 1986, plaintiffs conveyed property…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dumas v. HelmMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Cooper v. Jefferson Investment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Cooper v. Jefferson Investment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Sindlinger v. PaulMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Sindlinger v. PaulMichigan Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kent v. PipiaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. US Bank Trust Na v. Richard W BrydenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API