Kaufman v. M. Ferst & Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Practice in the Supreme Court. Injunction. Receivers. Before the Supreme Court. July Term, 1875. Reported in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Bleckley, Judge.
On a bill filed in October, 1874, an injunction was granted and a receiver appointed. The complainants in the bill were the defendants in error, and they sued as creditors of the plain*351tiffs in error, who wei’e non-residents of the state. One of the defendants in the bill was an agent of the plaintiffs in error, and was a resident, and carried on, in the city of Savannah, a banking business for his principals. A leading object of the bill was to hold the assets which were under the control of this agent, within the jurisdiction, to answer the .demands of creditors. To that end…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Jones v. Peach Trader Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- Hollinshead v. Town of LincolntonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Grizzel v. GrizzelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Jones v. WarnockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
- Smith v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.