Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. Payday Financial LLC
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided September 30, 2013No. CIV 11-3017-RALPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROBERTO A. LANGE, District Judge.
I. Introduction.
Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) filed this action invoking federal court jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1337(a), 1345, and 1355, as well as under provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTCA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 45(a), 45(m)(l)(A), 53(b), 56(a), and 57(b). There is no question about this Court’s jurisdiction or venue.
The FTC filed an Amended Complaint, Doc. 44, setting forth seven separate counts, five of which — Counts I, II,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Cross-Appellee v. Nelson Bunker Hunt, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Pantron I Corporation, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Federal Trade Commission v. Gem Merchandising Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Heldt v. Payday Financial, LLCDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2014
- Federal Trade Commission v. Vantage Point Services, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017
- United States of America Department of Justice v. Daniel Chapter OneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- de la Torre v. CashCall, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Federal Trade Commission v. American Screening, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.