Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Pantron I Corporation, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
These consolidated appeals require us to decide a previously unresolved question of federal consumer protection law: Whether it is lawful for a seller to represent a product as “effective” when its efficacy results solely from a “placebo effect.” 1 We conclude that the answer is no and that the representation constitutes a “false advertisement” under the Federal Trade Commission Act.
The Federal Trade Commission, Pantron I Corporation, and Hal Z. Lederman appeal separate parts of the district court’s order which enjoined Pantron and Lederman (Pan-tron’s president and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Amy Travel Service, Inc., Resort Performance, Inc., Resort Telemarketing, Inc., Thomas P. McCann Ii, and James F. WeilandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Bevan v. Trustees of Penn Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Federal Trade Commission v. H. N. Singer, Inc., and Michael Quinlan and James Earl WeihoffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Kraft, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. StefanchikCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Federal Trade Commission v. Affordable Media, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Jennifer Beardsall v. CVS Pharmacy, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Aspinall v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Dino Rikos v. The Procter & Gamble Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.