Legal Opinion
de la Torre v. CashCall, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 30, 2014No. Case No. 08-cv-03174-MEJPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Re: Dkt. Nos. 159, 166, 175
ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MARIA-ELENA JAMES, United States Magistrate Judge
INTRODUCTION
Pending before the Court are the Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant CashCall, Inc. regarding Plaintiffs Eduardo de la Torre and Lori Kempley’s1 (“Plaintiffs”) Conditioning Claim (“Def. Condit. Mot.,” Dkt. No. 159) and Uncon-scionability Claim (“Unc. Mot.,” Dkt. No 166). Also pending is Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Conditioning Claim and California Business and Professions Code section 17200 (“UCL”) Unfair Competition Claim…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- De La Torre v. CashCall, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2018
- Eduardo De La Torre v. Cashcall, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Irvine v. CookDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2024