Legal Opinion
United States of America Department of Justice v. Daniel Chapter One
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2010-1362PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge
This case involved certain dietary supplements that defendants claimed could treat, cure, or prevent cancer, inhibit tumors, and ameliorate the adverse effects of radiation and chemotherapy. Plaintiff United States of America Department of Justice (“United States” or the “government”) brought this action against Daniel Chapter One and James Feijo (the “defendants”) under Sections 5(1), 13(b), and 16(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 46(Z), 53(b), and 56(a), alleging that the defendants violated a final cease…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States Department of Justice v. Daniel Chapter OneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Hydroprocessing Associates, LLC v. McCartyDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2019
- National Council of Nonprofits v. Office of Management and BudgetDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- National Council of Nonprofits v. Office of Management and BudgetDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025