Legal Opinion
People v. Eddie L.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 2, 2009No. C059237PublishedCited by 3 opinions
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
Following a contested jurisdiction hearing, the juvenile court sustained a charge of second degree robbery while armed with a firearm against Eddie L., a minor. He was continued as a ward of the court and committed to the Sacramento County Boys Ranch.
On appeal, the minor contends that remand is required for the juvenile court to (1) make a discretionary determination of his maximum period of confinement as provided in Welfare and Institutions Code section 726, subdivision (c) (section 726(c)), 2 and (2) enter the minor’s maximum period of confinement in the minutes, and (3)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sourcecorp, Inc. v. ShillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- In re Albert W.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Albert W.California Court of Appeal · 2015