Snyder v. Harrisburg Railways Co.

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

Appellant’s street car ran into plaintiff’s automobile standing on a street in Harrisburg on a clear night between 10 and 11 o’clock causing the damage for which plaintiff now has judgment. The only matter for our consideration (a new trial was not asked for) is the refusal of defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v. Appellant contends that the motion should have been granted because (1) there was no evidence of defendant’s negligence, (2) plaintiff’s negligence contributed to the accident.

The jury may have made the following inferences of fact from the evidence. Plaintiff…