Legal Opinion

Glassman v. P. R. T. Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1933No. Appeal 222PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The plaintiffs have appealed from the refusal of the lower court to remove a nonsuit entered in a suit for damages to plaintiffs’ truck, resulting from a collision with a trolley car of the defendant company.

On the afternoon of a clear day, the driver of plaintiffs’ truck was -collecting merchandise and had occasion to stop at No. 134 South 17th Street in the city of Philadelphia. He stopped the truck at an angle to the line of traffic so that a small portion of the rear left end of the truck was near the west rail of the tracks of the defendant company. At this time he…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mead v. Central Pennsylvania Traction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  2. McFarland v. Consolidated Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Struse v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Brown v. Beaver Valley Traction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Rothberg v. Phila. R. T. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Frick-Reid Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. United States v. Philadelphia Transp. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Roof v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API