Legal Opinion

Rothweiler v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 19, 1927No. Appeal 217PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

On July 27, 1923, at about five o’clock in the afternoon plaintiff drove a truck northward on Ninth Street in the City of Philadelphia and parked it in front of his employer’s place of business, No. 131 North Ninth •Street. Defendant operates a single track trolley line on Ninth Street, the cars going north. Plaintiff was fully aware of this fact. The clear space between the overhang of the trolley car and the curb is about 8 feet ten inches. The truck was seven feet wide at its greatest width. Plaintiff reported to his employer that the rear left spring of the truck was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Roberts, Admr. v. Freihofer B. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Cramer v. Aluminum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. Warner v. Peoples' St.-Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. Reisinger v. McConnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Hause v. Lehigh Valley Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kilgallen v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Sipko v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Pollock v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Rothberg v. Phila. R. T. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Joannides, Admrx. v. NorrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API