Legal Opinion · Dissent

Anderson v. Board of County Road Commissioners

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1934No. Docket No. 83, Calendar No. 37,731Published

1DissentWiest, J.

Defendants appeal from a decree voiding assessments for improving a public highway and permitting recovery of sums paid. The proceeding was voidable ab initio for want of sufficient signatures of owners of lineal frontage.

Defendants contend that, under the statute, 1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 4381, and holdings in McDermott v. Board of County Road Com’rs of Kent County, 199 Mich. 613; Cummings v. Garner, 213 Mich. 408; Heliker v. Oakland County, 216 Mich. 595; Auditor General v. Union Lake Land Co., 239 Mich. 437, and decisions like Township of Norton v. Cockerill, 265 Mich. 405, upon comparable…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Township of Lake v. MillarMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Clinton v. SpencerMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Cummings v. GarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Township of Norton v. CockerillMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Heliker v. Oakland CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API